Subscribe

MFS’ Roberge: Time to ditch high-yield bonds for stocks

MFS CIO Roberge says bond prices and their low yields are worrisome.

High-yield-bond funds have been among the best performers since the financial crisis, but Mike Roberge, chief investment officer at MFS Investment Management, thinks that it is time for investors to move their high-yield allocation into stocks.
High-yield-bond funds have a five-year average annualized return of just under 15%, nearly on par with the 15.91% five-year average annualized return of large-cap funds, according to Morningstar Inc.
In months to come, however, Mr. Roberge expects those returns to decouple — with stocks the clear winners, he said Thursday at the UBS Wealth Management CIO Global Forum in New York.
Usually the case against high yield is built around worries about the economy, since the below-investment-grade bonds’ risk of default jumps during downturns. It’s not default risk that has Mr. Roberge worried.
Instead, the current price of the bonds and their low yields have persuaded him that stocks are now a better bet.
Most high-yield bonds are either trading at par or a premium, thanks to number of yield-hungry investors who have piled into the space. At those prices, there isn’t much, if any, room for capital appreciation, unless interest rates fall further.
“High yield is totally dependent on the [Federal Reserve] to get a higher return than the coupon,” Mr. Roberge said in an interview.
Today’s high-yield coupons, or their yield, are a far cry from what investors are used to because of the extra attention that the asset class has received. The Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Index, for example, has an average yield of 5.73%, far below the double-digit yields to which investors were treated in the past.
“High-yield rates have fallen so low that you now have interest rate risk,” Mr. Roberge said.
“Historically that hasn’t been the case,” he said. “There used to be a cushion.”
It all adds up to a strong case against high-yield bonds keeping up with stocks, if one thinks that the economy will continue growing, as Mr. Roberge does.
“You’re paying par or a premium for a market that has no upside, that still has economic risk and now has interest rate risk,” he said.
“We’re not anti-fixed income, but if you want to take economic risk right now, we prefer equities. They have more upside and offer better inflation protection,” Mr. Roberge said.
(Disagree? Check out an opposing view: For near-term boost, go with high-yield fixed income)

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Who will be alts’ best in show?

The demand for liquid alternatives has never been higher, and it is drawing in a pack of money managers who are all vying to be leaders of the pack.

One year on, iShares’ Core series clawing back market share for BlackRock

One year on, iShares' Core series is clawing back market share for BlackRock as price cuts, rebranding helps firm recover from case of “Vanguarditis.”

American Funds to expand sales force aggressively

The sales team will increase over the next six to eight months to help the company cope with the evolving adviser business model, said Matt O'Connor, director of distribution in North America.

American Funds makes push to increase transparency

Firm will share how portfolios are managed but won't reveal performance and holdings

Vanguard raked in almost every dollar that went into U.S. equity funds this year

If you bought a U.S. equity fund this year, there's about a 98% chance you invested in a fund managed by Vanguard. Jason Kephart has the story.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print