Subscribe

Reining in expungements

Move to restrict broker expungement should improve confidence that the arbitration system is fair to investors.

The vote by the Finra Board of Governors to make it more difficult for brokers to expunge black marks from their public records is welcome, and should improve confidence that the arbitration system is fair to investors.

When, as a study by the Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association showed, up to 90% of expungement requests were granted by arbitration panels, something is clearly out of whack. It is unlikely that 90% of brokers who have upset their clients enough to prompt an arbitration award have completely reformed their ways and deserve to have their records cleared.

The fact that such a high percentage of expungement requests is granted throws a cloud over the whole arbitration system, suggesting it is biased in favor of brokers.

The move by the board of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. rightly reminds arbitrators that expungement is an extraordinary remedy that should be granted only under “appropriate circumstances.”

PROVIDING MORE DETAILS

The board said customer dispute information should be expunged “only when it has no meaningful investor protection or regulatory value.”

It is appropriate also that an arbitration board should provide more details of the rationale for granting any expungement, and should examine a broker’s BrokerCheck report when making the decision.

Arbitration panels are supposed to determine if an investor has been wronged by a broker and, if so, to redress the wrong in a fair and expeditious manner. An unspoken responsibility is to help protect other investors from broker misbehavior or carelessness.

Therefore, arbitrators must not be too ready to expunge awards against brokers. Such records are important information for investors to have when deciding whether or not to trust their hard-earned savings to a particular broker.

Finra’s action builds on the protection provided last year when the SEC approved a rule that prevents firms from including in settlement agreements a stipulation that claimants would not oppose expungement.

Finra could take one more step: Make more effort to ensure the claimant in a dispute attends any expungement hearing, though if arbitration panels follow the new instructions, this should become less important.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Follow the data to ID the best prospects

Advisers play an important role in grooming the next generation of savvy consumers, which can be a win-win for clients and advisers alike.

Advisers need to get real with clients about what reasonable investment returns look like

There's a big disconnect between investor expectations and stark economic realities, especially among American millennials.

Help clients give wisely

Not all charities are created equal, and advisers shouldn't relinquish their role as stewards of their clients' wealth by avoiding philanthropy discussions

Finra, it’s high time for transparency

A call for new Finra leadership to be more forthcoming about the board's work.

ETF liquidity a growing point of financial industry contention

Little to indicate the ETF industry is fully prepared for a major rush to the exits by investors.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print