Subscribe

Naked shorting’s crux: BD failure to deliver

Regarding “SEC seen shy on naked shorting” (April 23), [Dan] Jamieson does a good job of explaining “naked…

Regarding “SEC seen shy on naked shorting” (April 23), [Dan] Jamieson does a good job of explaining “naked short selling” and the intention of Regulation SHO.
However, he neglects to describe how this problem was created.
In fact, if investors don’t understand this

Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

‘Borders on malpractice’ an outrageous assertion

Regarding “SEC seen shy on naked shorting” (April 23), [Dan] Jamieson does a good job of explaining “naked…

Is time right for specialized bond products?

Regarding “SEC seen shy on naked shorting” (April 23), [Dan] Jamieson does a good job of explaining “naked…

Optional charter seen saving agents money

Regarding “SEC seen shy on naked shorting” (April 23), [Dan] Jamieson does a good job of explaining “naked…

Bush offers subprime help

Regarding “SEC seen shy on naked shorting” (April 23), [Dan] Jamieson does a good job of explaining “naked…

Tax break sought for annuities

Companion bills sitting in committee would provide tax incentives for investing in individual annuities.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print