Subscribe

With ‘McDonald’s’ style menu, clients decide what they’re willing to pay for

Investment News

The more services they want, the more they pay — and vice versa.

When Curtis Sheldon launched his Alexandria, Va.-based advisory firm three years ago after retiring from the military, he opted for a fee structure that let clients choose the level of service best-suited to their needs.

“The AUM model just didn’t pass the logic test for me because I don’t think someone with $600,000 should pay twice as much as somebody with $300,000,” said Mr. Sheldon, owner of C.L. Sheldon & Co.

“I always felt like the AUM model was like a doctor charging you based on how much you weigh,” he added.

Mr. Sheldon, who works primarily with active-duty and retired members of the military, has adopted a fee structure sometimes referred to as a “McDonald’s menu” for the way it bundles services into different fee levels, in much the same way McDonald’s bundles menu items into different value meals.

The first level, which starts at $1,800 per year, broken into monthly payments, is mostly financial coaching.

“It is pure debt management and saving strategies, with no investment management,” said Mr. Sheldon, who is looking for a robo-advice platform to add to the first level.

The second level, which starts at $4,000 per year, is the financial planning level, on which the fees will climb depending on the complexity of the client’s situation. And $1,000 of the annual fee covers investment management services.

Then there’s the “gold-plated, wealth-management level, where we do everything,” Mr. Sheldon said.

The top-level fees start at $8,000 per year, $2,000 of which is for investment management.

(More: Why the AUM fee model is so dominant)

Most of his clients opt for the middle level of service, he said.

Mr. Sheldon said he has tweaked his fees since opening up shop because he realized he was underpricing his services.

“I started with the classic impostor syndrome and was pricing my services too low,” he said. “My clients know what they get if they sign up for each level.”

Related Topics: ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Are AUM fees heading toward extinction?

The asset-based model is the default setting for many firms, but more creative thinking is needed to attract the next generation of clients.

Advisors tilt toward ETFs, growth stocks and investment-grade bonds: Fidelity

Advisors hail traditional benefits of ETFs while trend toward aggressive equity exposure shows how 'soft landing has replaced recession.'

Chasing retirement plan prospects with a minority business owner connection

Martin Smith blends his advisory niche with an old-school method of rolling up his sleeves and making lots of cold calls.

Inflation data fuel markets but economists remain cautious

PCE inflation data is at its lowest level in two years, but is that enough to stop the Fed from raising interest rates?

Advisors roll with the Fed’s well-telegraphed monetary policy move

The June pause in the rate-hike cycle has introduced the possibility of another pause in September, but most advisors see rates higher for longer.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print