Subscribe

Finra rule to rein in rogue brokers goes into force

rogue

The New Year may not be so happy for firms that employ a high number of registered reps with disciplinary histories.

Finra is starting the New Year with more latitude to rein in rogue brokerages.

A new Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. rule went into effect Jan. 1 that enables the broker-dealer self-regulator to impose additional capital obligations and other conditions on brokerages that employ a high number of registered reps with significant disciplinary histories.

Under the rule, Finra can require a “restricted firm” to deposit cash or qualified securities in segregated, restricted accounts that are controlled by Finra. The money could be used to fund arbitration awards and for other purposes.

“Finra believes that the direct financial impact of a restricted deposit is likely to change such member firms’ behavior—and therefore protect investors,” Finra said in a regulatory notice.

The rule was approved last summer by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Finra will make an annual determination of which brokerages pose heightened investor-protection risks. The criteria includes the number of firm-level and individual-level regulatory disclosures.

“The multi-step process includes numerous features designed to narrowly focus the new obligations on the firms most of concern,” the regulatory notice states. 

Finra has been under pressure for years to crack down on firms that hire a high number of brokers who have violated the self-regulator’s rules. In April 2018, it issued guidance on heightened supervision.

The new rule will help Finra identify potential problem brokerages before they harm investors, said Marlon Paz, a partner at Latham & Watkins.

“It is not just addressing misbehavior in the capital markets through enforcement, but it’s addressing misbehavior through prevention,” said Paz, a former counsel in the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets. Finra “is not just continuing to play whack-a-mole. It’s about smart investor protection.”

The rule allows a firm to avoid the “restricted” category by voluntarily reducing its workforce, explaining why it doesn’t deserve the designation or proposing an alternative punishment.

It’s not clear how many firms will be designated as restricted. As the rule was being developed, Finra indicated the number likely would be small.

But Paz is concerned that small firms will make up most of the restricted roster and said that the amount of time to work with Finra “to get out of the penalty box” may not be sufficient for firms with limited resources.

“I hope Finra remains vigilant that the onus [of the new rule] is not borne by smaller firms that continue to struggle to compete,” Paz said.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print