Editorial

SEC turns gaze to municipals

Scrutiny is welcome as muni bonds have long been a choice vehicle for tax-free income

Apr 13, 2014 @ 12:01 am

municipal bonds, munis, muni bonds, sec, securities and exchange commission
+ Zoom

The Securities and Exchange Commission is turning its enforcement attention to municipal bond issuers, who have escaped close attention for too long.

The development is important for individual investors, particularly retirees, and their advisers because municipal bonds have long been a choice vehicle for tax-free income.

But since the Great Recession in 2008-09, investor faith in the muni bond market has been shaken by the financial difficulties of cities such as Detroit and Stockton, Calif., and counties such as Jefferson County, Ala., which have all sought protection from creditors.

INVESTIGATIONS

Now the SEC has opened investigations into whether some municipalities might have misled investors about their financial health before they issued bonds.

In a sign of its new interest in making sure municipalities play fair with investors, last year, the regulator charged Harrisburg, Pa., with securities fraud for issuing misleading public statements when its financial condition was deteriorating. The SEC said the financial information that was made available to municipal bond investors was either incomplete or outdated.

(See also: Muni regulator pursues rule to increase price transparency)

The SEC found that Harrisburg failed to comply with requirements to provide certain financial information and audited financial statements for the benefit of investors holding hundreds of millions of dollars in bonds issued or guaranteed by the city. Harrisburg settled the case without admitting the agency's charges.

The SEC has told issuers and underwriters that they will face less severe penalties if they self-report violations than if it launches enforcement actions against them.

The new spotlight on municipal bond issuers and underwriters is welcome. At about $3.7 trillion, the municipal bond market is important for investors and local governments. If investors lose any more confidence in municipal bonds, both will be hurt.

The SEC's investigations should serve as a warning to municipalities and their underwriters that they must be brutally honest about their finances when they issue bonds, and they should reassure investors that the agency is working to protect them.

For advisers, the SEC's actions should reinforce the need to vet fully any and all muni bonds they put into client portfolios.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

INTV

Schwab's Jon Beatty: How independent firms are winning high-net-worth clients

Independent advisers have a distinct advantage when it comes to acquiring new clients, according to Schwab's latest RIA Benchmarking Study. Jon Beatty, senior vice president at Schwab Advisor Services, discusses the findings.

Latest news & opinion

DOL fiduciary rule causing DC-plan record keepers to change business with insurance agents

Principal has communicated that independent agents must change their business models to keep receiving compensation.

DOL fiduciary rule opponents want to push implementation back until 2019

ICI, Chamber of Commerce among groups asking for delay, while Democratic lawmakers call on DOL to keep to its earlier planned schedule of Jan. 1, 2018.

Take 5: Vanguard's new CIO Greg Davis talks bonds, stocks and costs

Having just stepped into the role, this veteran of the firm now oversees $3.8 trillion in assets in more than 300 mutual funds and exchange-traded funds.

Tech companies deploy behavioral finance tools for advisers

They seek to turn knowing more about clients into growing more revenue.

Retirement planning for women

Longer lifespans and lower savings require creative income strategies.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print