Editorial

SEC turns gaze to municipals

Scrutiny is welcome as muni bonds have long been a choice vehicle for tax-free income

Apr 13, 2014 @ 12:01 am

The Securities and Exchange Commission is turning its enforcement attention to municipal bond issuers, who have escaped close attention for too long.

The development is important for individual investors, particularly retirees, and their advisers because municipal bonds have long been a choice vehicle for tax-free income.

But since the Great Recession in 2008-09, investor faith in the muni bond market has been shaken by the financial difficulties of cities such as Detroit and Stockton, Calif., and counties such as Jefferson County, Ala., which have all sought protection from creditors.

(Don't miss: SEC examining hidden prices in bond trading)

INVESTIGATIONS

Now the SEC has opened investigations into whether some municipalities might have misled investors about their financial health before they issued bonds.

In a sign of its new interest in making sure municipalities play fair with investors, last year, the regulator charged Harrisburg, Pa., with securities fraud for issuing misleading public statements when its financial condition was deteriorating. The SEC said the financial information that was made available to municipal bond investors was either incomplete or outdated.

(See also: Muni regulator pursues rule to increase price transparency)

The SEC found that Harrisburg failed to comply with requirements to provide certain financial information and audited financial statements for the benefit of investors holding hundreds of millions of dollars in bonds issued or guaranteed by the city. Harrisburg settled the case without admitting the agency's charges.

The SEC has told issuers and underwriters that they will face less severe penalties if they self-report violations than if it launches enforcement actions against them.

The new spotlight on municipal bond issuers and underwriters is welcome. At about $3.7 trillion, the municipal bond market is important for investors and local governments. If investors lose any more confidence in municipal bonds, both will be hurt.

The SEC's investigations should serve as a warning to municipalities and their underwriters that they must be brutally honest about their finances when they issue bonds, and they should reassure investors that the agency is working to protect them.

For advisers, the SEC's actions should reinforce the need to vet fully any and all muni bonds they put into client portfolios.

0
Comments

What do you think?

View comments

Recommended for you

Featured video

Gadget Girl

Gadget Girl: The case of demystifying workflows

For today's case, Gadget Girl infiltrates Redtail U to find out how they have flipped the script on process and workflows by creating a great training program for advisers and their support staff.

Latest news & opinion

Tax reform debate sparks fresh interest in donor-advised funds

Schwab reports new accounts up 50% from last year, assets up 33%.

Nontraded REITs to post worst sales since 2002

The industry is on track to raise just $4.4 billion, well off the $19.6 billion it raised just four years ago, as new regulations hinder sales.

Broker protocol for recruiting a boon for clients

New research finds advisers whose firms have joined the agreement take better care of customers.

Meet our 2017 Women to Watch

Introducing 20 female financial advisers and industry executives who are distinguished leaders, advancing the business of providing advice through their creativity and hard work.

Raymond James executives call on industry to keep broker protocol

Also ask firms to pay for the administration of the protocol to 'ensure its longevity and relevance.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print