Subscribe

Finra fines Prudential $1M over sloppy retirement-plan information

Hand making stop motion

Regulator says flawed communications left plan participants in dark about investment costs

Finra fined Prudential Investment Management Services $1 million for sending inaccurate and incomplete information to retirement-plan participants that hindered their ability to choose investments, the regulator said in a settlement earlier this week.

In a Jan. 14 agreement with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., Prudential accepted the fine and a censure but neither admitted nor denied Finra’s findings. Prudential also agreed to bring in an independent consultant to help it fix the problems Finra cited.

Between January 2010 and June 2017, Prudential provided retirement plan sponsors and participants inaccurate information about expense ratios and historical performance for investment options offered through a group variable annuity, Finra alleged.

Finra also alleged that between October 2003 and December 2018, Prudential provided inaccurate third-party ratings for the investments in the group VA and that between January 2004 and September 2019, Prudential omitted some information about money market fund investment options.

Finra said the firm lacked supervisory systems and procedures to ensure that the communications to plans and participants were reliable. The flawed information was disseminated to at least 73,000 plan participants.

“As a result, sponsors and participants using the inaccurate and/or incomplete communications that [Prudential] provided were not provided with information to enable them to correctly assess or compare the costs associated with different investment options, the historical performance, or the potential return of those investments,” the settlement states.

Prudential said it cooperated with Finra.

“Transparency, doing the right thing, and maintaining constructive relationships with regulators are foundational to how Prudential conducts business,” the company said in a statement. “Upon discovery of the issues following a FINRA inquiry, Prudential conducted a thorough review, reported its findings, and fully cooperated with FINRA. We have taken action to address the issues and are pleased to have this matter resolved.”

The case is another example of a regulatory focus on fees and expenses, said Barry Temkin, a partner at Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass, although in this instance, fraud was not alleged in conveying the performance information.

“It just seems like the regulators feel there’s a sloppiness about the communications about fees and performance,” Mr. Temkin said. “The message is they want the funds and the broker-dealers to step up their game a little bit and make sure their communications with the public are more accurate.”

Prudential Investment Management Services is the broker-dealer through which several Prudential Financial Inc. businesses sell securities products and offer broker services, according to the settlement. Prudential administers approximately 3,188 defined contribution retirement plans.

Related Topics: , , , ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print